Article Summary
- The Illinois State Board of Elections deadlocked, 4-4, on partisan lines when determining whether Senate President Don Harmon violated fundraising restrictions in 2024.
- The board fined Harmon $9.8 million for accepting greater campaign donations than the law allowed in 2024. He appealed, leading to Tuesday’s hearing before the full board.
- After the split vote, the board postponed official action on the fine until its next meeting in November.
- A hearing officer and attorney for the board had recommended the board find Harmon in violation of state law.
This summary was written by the reporters and editors who worked on this story.
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (Capitol News Illinois) – The Illinois State Board of Elections deadlocked Tuesday on whether Senate President Don Harmon broke state election laws by accepting millions of dollars for his campaign after the 2024 primary.
Staff at the elections board fined Harmon’s campaign $9.8 million earlier this year following a Chicago Tribune report that Harmon improperly accepted $4 million more than was allowed during the 2024 election.
Harmon appealed, which sent the matter to a hearing officer, who recommended the full board let the fine stand.
But the board, made up of four appointed Republicans and four appointed Democrats, deadlocked in a 4-4 partisan decision on Tuesday as to whether the fine should stand.
The move created confusion among all parties, including the board’s legal counsel, and ultimately postponed official action on the matter until the board’s next meeting in November.
Contribution caps
The donations in question involve a state law that limits contributions to campaigns during an election cycle. Under the law, a campaign becomes “self-funded” when the candidate contributes or loans more than $100,000 into the campaign. Once that happens, the candidate and their opponents are no longer subject to limits on how much people or political action committees can contribute to the campaign.
Harmon, an Oak Park Democrat, contributed $100,001 to his own campaign in January 2023. His lawyers argued that move should have busted the caps until his name next appeared on the ballot, which it has not since the Senate president made the move.
Staff at the elections board determined the move should have been good only through the next primary election, meaning the campaign fund improperly collected about $4 million after the 2024 primary.
Read more: Senate President Harmon appeals $10M fine for improper campaign contributions
Harmon appealed that fine, but a hearing officer and attorney for the board recommended on Oct. 7 that the board should let it stand.
The 4-4 partisan vote left the board in what members described as an “unprecedented” stalemate. Harmon’s attorney, Michael Kasper, argued the board cannot order Harmon to pay a fine because a majority of the board failed to approve it.
The board’s deputy general counsel, Jordan Andrew, initially said the fine should stand because the board did not vote to accept Harmon’s appeal. Normally, fined parties have 30 days to pay, she said.
Kasper promised to challenge any fines in Cook County Circuit Court, but argued he wouldn’t have legal standing to file a lawsuit because a majority of the board had not approved the fine.
After more than an hour of debate about how the board handles 4-4 decisions, it unanimously agreed to punt the issue to its November meeting. That would allow board attorneys to research what the appropriate next steps should be and whether Harmon’s campaign should still be fined after a tied vote.
Time is also ticking for Harmon to resolve the case, as state law prohibits candidates from running for office if they have unpaid fines to the board. The board will certify the 2026 primary ballot in January — on which Harmon’s name is expected to appear.
Harmon’s arguments
Kasper argued limits on Harmon’s fundraising should have remained off through the 2026 election, noting the state law regulating self-funded candidates refers only to “elections” and not “election cycles.” He said reestablishing caps either after the 2024 primary or general election would establish new limits on fundraising in the middle of Harmon’s term.
Kasper argued that allowing Harmon to self-fund only for a short period in 2024 when he was not on the ballot gives him an unfair advantage to raise unlimited amounts of money well before any challengers would have considered running against him in 2026.
“What the legislature intended to do by creating two election cycles for the Senate was to equalize the treatment of House candidates and Senate candidates,” Kasper said. “That was the intention of the statute all along.”
Though Harmon was not on the ballot in 2024, legislative leaders often use their campaign funds to help other candidates in their caucuses with their races, often through direct contributions or by covering expenses for their members’ campaigns.
The board’s Democrats were sympathetic to Kasper’s arguments. Member Jennifer Ballard Croft, a Cook County Democrat, said the legislature created an “intentional distinction” when it referred only to “elections” in the self-funding law.
Harmon had $16.5 million in his account as of Sept. 30, which can be used to pay the possible fine to the elections board.
Board’s decision
Hearing officer Barbara Goodman’s recommendation pointed to six times Harmon’s campaign correctly filed self-funding notices as evidence Harmon was familiar with the timeframes that a candidate can remove contribution limits. In January, for example, he lifted contributions limits through the March 2026 primary.
“The committee (Harmon’s campaign) for the first time, either changed its interpretation of the time period for lifting of the contribution limits or simply chose to ignore them,” Goodman wrote in her recommendation that the board uphold the original fine.
Illinois’ law defining the timeframes of election cycles is clear, Goodman wrote. Cycles either begin Jan. 1 the year after a general election and continue through the following primary election, or they begin the day after a primary election and continue through Dec. 31 of that year. Those cycles apply regardless of a state legislator’s term in office, she wrote.
In Harmon’s case, that means the election cycle without fundraising limits would have ended at the March 2024 primary and any contributions after that should have been limited.
Goodman wrote Kasper made “interesting albeit unsupported arguments” about the definition of election cycles, but Harmon demonstrated in multiple other election cycles he was aware of how they are defined.
“This committee has funded and made a deliberate action to put the $100,001 into their account to self-fund five times prior to this and I think that shows there was an understanding of the statute as recommended by the hearing officer or a pretty serious mistake was made,” board Chair Laura Donahue, a Republican, said.
(Reporting by Ben Szalinski, Capitol News Illinois)
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
Comments