Article Summary
- A federal judge on Friday ordered U.S. Customs and Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino to testify in federal court on Oct. 28. The order came the day after Bovino himself threw a canister of tear gas into a crowd of protesters Thursday in Chicago’s Little Village neighborhood.
- U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis had already ordered Bovino be deposed in a case over the Department of Homeland Security’s crowd control tactics after she said she was concerned federal immigration agents were violating her Oct. 9 restraining order restricting the use of tear gas, pepper balls and other non-lethal “riot control” weapons.
- Another federal judge in Chicago heard arguments Friday over whether a consent decree that prohibits warrantless arrests by U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement authorizes the judge to order the release of hundreds of undocumented immigrants from detention to electronic monitoring.
- In the hearing in front of U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings, Department of Justice lawyers estimated approximately 3,000 people in the Chicago area have been arrested by both ICE and CBP since mid-June.
This summary was written by the reporters and editors who worked on the story.
CHICAGO (Capitol News Illinois) — U.S. Customs and Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino, who has spent the last 5 ½ weeks running the Trump administration’s “Operation Midway Blitz” immigration enforcement campaign in the Chicago area, has been ordered to testify in federal court Tuesday after allegations he threw tear gas into a crowd Thursday with neither warning nor justification.
Following news of federal agents deploying tear gas again on Friday, U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis set an Oct. 28 hearing in an ongoing case over the Department of Homeland Security’s use of crowd control tactics on protesters. The judge also ordered lawyers for the Trump administration to “produce Defendant Gregory Bovino, in person, for this hearing.”
Ellis had already ordered Bovino be deposed in the case during an Oct. 20 hearing in which the judge expressed concern that DHS officials and immigration agents alike weren’t following her Oct. 9 temporary restraining order restricting the use of “riot control” weapons, including tear gas, on protesters.
The judge questioned a pair of officials from CBP and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement about recent clashes between federal agents and members of the public, whose spontaneous protests unfolding against immigration arrests in their neighborhoods ended in tear gas deployment.
Read more: Immigration officials seek to justify use of force on Chicago-area protesters | Judge grants restraining order protecting protesters, journalists in Chicago-area clashes
CBP Deputy Incident Commander Kyle Harvick told Ellis that his agents’ use of tear gas in two incidents earlier this month was warranted, as protesters were impeding on their ability to perform their mission, in addition to endangering agents. The judge’s order prohibits agents from using “less-lethal” weapons like tear gas, pepper balls, rubber bullets, flashbang grenades and tasers on protesters who don’t pose an immediate threat.
But agents can issue a crowd dispersal order “when three or more persons are committing acts of disorderly conduct that are likely to cause substantial harm,” according to the order. In that case, the use of riot control weapons is permitted if protesters are given at least two separate warnings loud enough for the crowd to hear and allowing for “reasonable time and opportunity for individuals to voluntarily comply.”
In a 12-minute video submitted to Ellis on Thursday, Bovino cannot be heard giving such warnings before tossing a canister of tear gas into a crowd of protesters hours earlier in Chicago’s Little Village neighborhood, which is heavily populated by Mexican immigrants.
Immigration agents deployed tear gas again Friday after protesters surrounded the feds’ rental cars in Chicago’s wealthy Lake View neighborhood. And on Saturday, agents deployed tear gas in Chicago’s Irving Park and Avondale neighborhoods.
The Trump administration has claimed the only way to protect immigration agents from protesters that DHS officials have called “violent” and “rioters” is by deploying the National Guard. But a federal judge has blocked troops’ activation in Illinois — at least until the U.S. Supreme Court weighs in.
Read more: Judge’s block on deploying National Guard extended indefinitely as Supreme Court weighs case | Judge calls feds ‘unreliable,’ temporarily blocks National Guard deployment to Illinois
Request for release
Bovino has been the face of Operation Midway Blitz since his mid-September arrival in the Chicago area fresh from running a similar campaign in Los Angeles. He has made numerous media appearances defending the Trump administration’s tactics in addition to using his own social media channels to promote CBP’s capture of undocumented immigrants with long criminal histories.
But in another Chicago federal courtroom Friday, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings heard arguments that the majority of the roughly 3,000 arrests CBP and ICE have made in Chicago and its suburbs in the last four months don’t have criminal backgrounds. Immigration and civil rights attorneys told the judge that as many as 2,000 of those are not subject to mandatory detention and should be released to electronic monitoring.
The judge questioned Department of Justice attorney William Weiland on the conditions in which those who’ve been arrested have been held, including in the ICE processing facility in the Chicago suburb of Broadview — the scene of many protests in recent weeks. After Weiland balked that the question of treatment is “beyond the scope” of the consent decree, Cummings pointed out that the DOJ had included it in its own filing not long ago.
“Can you certify to me that potential class members who are being detained are being held in safe and sanitary conditions?” the judge asked. “Can you certify that as an officer of the court?”
“No, I cannot,” Weiland said before offering to retract that statement for the record.
Asked whether detainees had “sufficient access to counsel,” Weiland said he’d have to “have a conversation with my client about that.”
Warrantless arrests, CBP assists
Cummings already ruled earlier this month that ICE had violated a 2022 consent decree that limits immigration agents’ authority to make warrantless arrests unless they have probable cause to believe a person is in the country illegally and he or she is a flight risk. Though it was scheduled to expire in May, plaintiffs’ attorneys had asked for an extension, which was supposed to have left it in place while the judge weighed the arguments.
But on June 11, a top ICE lawyer emailed all agency employees advising the consent decree was dead and officially rescinding the corresponding agency policy restricting warrantless arrests.
As a result, Cummings extended the consent decree until February. In his ruling earlier this month, the judge wrote that agents’ practice of carrying blank warrant forms and filling them out at the scene of an arrest was “explicitly designed” to get around the requirement that agents have probable cause before arresting an undocumented immigrant.
Read more: Court scrutiny of ICE mounts as judge rules warrantless arrests violated order
On Friday, Cummings agreed that the consent decree also applies to CBP, as DHS describes Operation Midway Blitz as an “ICE operation.”
“CBP is working with ICE,” he said. “So any arrests as part of this operation I view as arrests working with ICE.”
Policy changes, increased detentions
Between June 11 — the date Cummings determined ICE had officially violated the consent decree — and Oct. 7 when Cummings issued his order extending the consent decree, ICE made nearly 1,900 arrests.
And on Friday, Weiland told Cummings CBP has arrested “right around 1,200” people as part of Operation Midway Blitz.
Before a September 5 decision from the U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals, the vast majority of undocumented immigrants who were arrested would be released on bond after an immigration judge determined a person didn’t have a disqualifying criminal record and was not a danger to the community or a flight risk.
But less than two weeks since Operation Midway Blitz began last month, the Trump administration’s BIA reversed decades of precedent and ruled that detention would be mandatory for any undocumented immigrant who entered the U.S. without being “admitted” by an immigration officer.
A few days later, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a Sept. 8 concurring opinion that although “apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion” for immigration enforcement actions, it can be a “relevant factor.” Based on reasonable suspicion, Kavanaugh wrote that “immigration officers may briefly stop the individual and inquire about immigration status.”
Those two decisions, combined with ICE’s unilateral decision that the consent decree was dead, have resulted in far more arrests and detentions than there otherwise would be under previous policies and precedents. It’s also meant that those who’ve been swept up in Operation Midway Blitz have included undocumented immigrants who’ve been in the U.S. for years or even decades, and who are now being expedited for deportation.
Attorneys for immigrant and civil rights argued to Cummings on Friday that the Sept. 5 BIA decision represented a sea change that was unforeseeable at the time they and the DOJ agreed to the 2022 consent decree. Despite pushback from the DOJ’s Weiland, the judge seemed to agree, saying the consent decree would be essentially useless if “everyone who was arrested and subject to detention proceedings would be detained as a mandatory matter.”
“What good would this agreement be?” Cummings asked. “Why would they agree to do something that had no effect?”
The judge also pointed out more than 100 of his colleagues across the country have rejected DHS’ arguments on mandatory detention since the agency began testing the new legal theory in July.
Faster deportations
Plaintiffs attorneys argued that because the Trump administration had committed “repeat material violations” of the consent decree and because last month’s BIA decision altered the playing field, Cummings had the authority to order the release of many detainees to electronic monitoring.
DOJ attorneys accused opposing counsel of painting with too broad a brush and the judge said he wasn’t comfortable with issuing a blanket ruling, as “it could be that some of these individuals should not be released and are properly subject to mandatory detention.”
But Cummings did order DHS to file briefs on the feasibility of handing over the names, arrest dates, country of origin and “A numbers” for all detainees. That information will help determine who among the 3,000 would be eligible for release on bond under DHS’ long-running policies — at least those who haven’t yet been deported.
Mark Fleming of the Chicago-based National Immigrant Justice Center told Cummings that time is not on the side of detainees, as many have been pressured to sign voluntarily deportation agreements or have otherwise had their removal proceedings fast-tracked. He cited the case of an undocumented immigrant arrested in Elgin as part of a pre-dawn raid that kicked off Operation Midway Blitz last month. The man had previously suffered a massive stroke that left his communication abilities impaired.
“He cannot speak but apparently can consent to voluntary departure to Mexico,” Fleming said. “We had to scramble to make sure there was someone to care for him.”
By Hannah Meisel
Capitol News Illinois
hmeisel@capitolnewsillinois.com
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
Comments